Britain's unelected prime miniature described Iran's retaliatory strike against Israel as 'unprecedented'. While I do understand that English may not be his first language, let me explain what the word means. It basically means actions that have never happened before, an historical 'first' if you like. Someone may want to correct me but I believe Israel's complete destruction of a Country that is not legally at war with's foreign embassy causing injuries and fatalities IS unprecedented, while merely responding in self defence to an unprovoked attack on their territory is certainly not unprecedented Pearl Harbor eg.!
Legally foreign embassy's are part of that Country, if you entered the Iranian Embassy in Damascus (when it was there), legally you are in Iran.
Legally foreign embassy's are part of that Country, if you entered the Iranian Embassy in Damascus (when it was there), legally you are in Iran.
Last edited: