So Britain's pro Israeli Ambassador to the UN has weirdly voted for a binding UN resolution at the Security Council, that Israel says it will just ignore because they know America won't approve any punitive action against them if they don't. However she (UK Ambassador) says there shouldn't be a ceasefire until Hamas no longer has the capacity to attack Israel? Well why vote for the ceasefire then???
Anyway she has it the wrong way round, it should be until Hamas no longer has the will or the reason to attack Israel and that can only be achieved by a peace deal that includes Palestinian statehood, not bombs.
Also note the red top behind her! Could that be the real reason they are voting for a ceasefire when they would (or their blackmailers) would prefer them not to and the real reason I was badly poisoned this weekend. Sorry but I just ain't intimidated by bullies or their Pro Israeli blackmailers.
Anyway she has it the wrong way round, it should be until Hamas no longer has the will or the reason to attack Israel and that can only be achieved by a peace deal that includes Palestinian statehood, not bombs.
Also note the red top behind her! Could that be the real reason they are voting for a ceasefire when they would (or their blackmailers) would prefer them not to and the real reason I was badly poisoned this weekend. Sorry but I just ain't intimidated by bullies or their Pro Israeli blackmailers.
Last edited: